 |
August 2009 Health in the News Archive
The brain may not be fooled by sugar substitutes
August 31, 2009
New research from the Netherlands suggests that even when artificial sweeteners fool the taste buds, they still don't fool the area of the brain that actually responds to regular, refined table sugar.
Paul Smeets, a neuroscientist at University Medical Center Utrecht, used a technique called functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to measure brain responses in people sipping two versions of orangeade, one containing sugar and one containing a mix of four artificial sweeteners: aspartame, acesulfame K, cyclamate and saccharin. The fMRI scans revealed consistent differences in how their brains responded.
Both sugar and the artificial sweeteners activated a brain region called the amygdala, which signals sensory pleasure. But only the drink with sugar turned on a cherry-sized nugget of brain tissue in a region called the caudate. That little nugget, Smeets concluded, seemed to be where the brain registered the fact the real sugar comes with calories.
"We think the brain can distinguish, even if the people themselves cannot distinguish, between a caloric and a noncaloric sweet drink," says Smeets, who presented his results at the Human Brain Mapping meeting in San Francisco in June.
"The ideal artificial sweetener would really fool the body," Smeets says. "But I'm not sure that is possible." So when people consume artificial sugars, the body does not register that calories have been consumed, so there is no feeling of fullness.
In another study earlier this year, Edward Chambers, an exercise physiologist at the University of Birmingham in Britain, compared the effects of sugar and artificial sweeteners on peoples' ability to do hard aerobic exercise -- and he found some striking differences.
Chambers has previously shown that the mere taste of sugar can improve endurance in athletes who have fasted for several hours. If the athletes rinse their mouth with sugared water but don't swallow any, it improves their performance in an hour-long cycling workout by a small but consistent amount. The little bit of sugar absorbed through the mucous membranes of the mouth, and the promise that more will soon reach the bloodstream, provokes the cyclists' brains to drive their legs harder -- the same way that the promise of a paycheck in the mail motivates a cash-strapped student to go shoe shopping.
But when Chambers tried the same experiment with artificial sweeteners, he saw no such effect. Tasting the artificial sweeteners didn't improve cycling speed, even though they tasted sweet.
"The sweetness is the conscious perception of the substance," Chambers says. "But there also appears to be this unconscious nutrient-sensing occurring" in the mouth. Although the athletes couldn't consciously distinguish between drinks made with sugar versus artificial sweeteners, their brains knew the difference.
Although some studies over the years have found that artificially sweetened foods and drinks reduce calorie consumption and weight gain, others suggest they might not.
A study published in the May 1, 2009 issue of the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, showed that weight gain and obesity are more linked to an increase in liquid calories, particularly sugar-sweetened beverages, than calories from solid food.
Previous research has shown that drinking an artificially sweetened beverage can whet the appetite and stimulate people to eat more in a subsequent meal - an effect not seen when people drink a beverage with real sugar or a glass of water before eating. It suggests that artificial sweeteners may turn on brain areas that create appetite, but not provide satiation.
Dr. Grout's Comment:
This goes a long way toward explaining an experience I had many years ago. I had been drinking lots of diet sodas (before I knew better). Then I ate 6 donuts at one sitting and said to myself: "Something is drastically wrong here." I realized that my body was not happy with the diet sodas, and was telling me so. Now I know what the problem was. My brain was not happy with the lack of actual sweetness, even though it had the perception of sweetness. It's kind of like counterfeit money – looks like money, but doesn't cut the muster when you actually go to buy something. Of course, counterfeit money doesn't actually poison you, the way many of the artificial sweeteners do. You'd be safer eating the counterfeit money and spending the chemicals. So if we eat artificial sweeteners, it's no wonder that we weigh more. Our brains are doing their best to get real nourishment (glucose, not aspartame) by telling us we need to eat more real food.
Antibiotic-resistant bacteria are more of a threat than Swine Flu
August 17, 2009
An August 12th editorial in the Wall Street Journal points out that several outbreaks of disease in recent years caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria have killed far more people than swine flu over the same period.
The writers are both doctors: Dr. Schwaber, director of the National Center for Infection Control of the Israel Ministry of Health; and Dr. Carmeli, director of the Division of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine at Tel Aviv Medical Center and affiliated with the Division of Infectious Diseases at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston.
"Before the advent of the antibiotic era some 70 years ago, pneumonia, meningitis, gangrene and bloodstream infection were almost uniformly fatal," they wrote. "But with antibiotics, they suddenly became treatable. Unfortunately, the era of easily treated infections is proving to be short-lived, as bacteria develop increasingly sophisticated mechanisms of resistance to antibiotics.
"Antibiotic-resistant bacteria typically do not threaten healthy people at first. Rather, they generally appear initially among hospitalized patients and only later spread to the community at large. But they are deadly. In the same period as the swine flu outbreak, antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections have killed thousands of people in the U.S.
"In contrast to the flu, most of these infections receive little or no public attention. The only exception has been methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). This microbe is now receiving significant public attention—but this attention has come some three decades after its spread in the U.S. first began. That delay allowed MRSA to spread uncontrollably, and more than 18,000 people are now estimated to die each year in the U.S. from this bug, according to the Journal of the American Medical Association.
"Yet the spread of these and other resistant bacteria has met with almost no coordinated effort to fight them in the U.S. Very few resources have been allocated to combat antimicrobial resistance."
The doctors point out that public education campaigns in England and Israel succeeded in containing the spread of bacteria.
Dr. Grout's Comment:
Great perspective – until you get to this sentence: "The pharmaceutical industry should also be encouraged to develop new antibiotics to fight resistant bacteria."
What's that definition of insanity? Doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result. One of the great mistakes of medicine was the assumption that bugs are not intelligent. No matter what we throw at them, the bugs adapt and too often become superbugs in the process. Public education campaigns are valuable, but we must also change our mindset that we are at war with our bodies, and that an antibiotic or vaccine is the fix.
The New York Times reported in January that "Last winter, about 11 percent of the throat swabs from patients with the most common type of flu that were sent to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for genetic typing showed a Tamiflu-resistant strain. This season, 99 percent do."
And let's not forget that more than half the antibiotics used in the U.S. are fed to industrial farm animals to promote weight gain and compensate for unsanitary conditions. As Dr. Frederick J. Angulo of the CDC said, "There is scientific consensus that antibiotic use in food animals contributes to resistance in humans." We are awash in antibiotics.
A report to the American Institute of Homeopathy in 1921 documented the dramatic success of homeopathy in the worst flu pandemic in history. The death rate of 24,000 flu cases under conventional medical care in that study was 28.2 percent, while the death rate of 26,000 cases treated with homeopathy was a nearly miraculous 1.05 percent. Similarly, many homeopathic physicians each reported treating thousands of patients with very few deaths. Homeopathy recognizes the body's innate wisdom and respects its ability to heal itself.
At the Arizona Center for Advanced Medicine, we use homeopathy. We also make use of high quality silver – a time-honored antibiotic. Influenza is a virus and immensely susceptible to vitamin C – we administer therapeutic doses intravenously to which we can add glutathione, the body's own antioxidant, immune system booster, and detoxifier. We can also clean the blood of viruses, fungi and more with UV light. We can add ozone to oxidize (kill) the molecules in the shell of the virus. You have many effective options available to you that come without side effects.
Soda Pop declines, specialty waters more popular, and obesity soars
August 13, 2009
According to a Beverage Digest report last March, U.S. carbonated soft drink volume fell for the fourth straight year in 2008. Sales of bottled water were also dropping because groups like Food and Water Watch and Corporate Accountability International are educating people that tap water is often healthier. Environmental Working Group recently reported on contaminants found in bottled water.
Soda companies are putting their marketing savvy into "enhanced" specialty waters.
"For sports fans, it was hard to miss the ubiquitous marketing effort on behalf of Vitaminwater," wrote Andrea Whitfill August 12 in AlterNet. "It was all over the TV during the NCAA and NBA championships this year … I began to read the contents and had quite an eye-opening moment. Vitaminwater had ‘natural' ingredients like ‘processed crystalline fructose,' ‘natural' caffeine ... And as I did the math, I realized there were 125 calories in one of those sexy bottles, along with 32.5 grams of sugar ... To put this into perspective - a can of Coke contains 140 calories and 39 grams of sugar, so a bottle of Vitaminwater (20 ounces) is almost as toxic as a 12-ounce can of Coke ... That's when it dawned on me - could Vitaminwater be a part of the obesity problem? Not Vitaminwater alone, but this false fantasy we're buying into, that we are doing something healthy for ourselves by drinking the stuff and consuming other ‘natural' products ..."
The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) had to admit that some Vitaminwater varieties can be problematic when drunk by student athletes, with "Energy" and "Rescue" containing an ingredient or ingredients - caffeine and guarana seed extract (a caffeine source) - that are included on the NCAA's drug-testing list of banned substances. The NCAA places a limit on the amount of caffeine that can be found in the urine of a student-athlete.
Dr. Grout's Comment:
In this past year, the obesity rates among adults rose in 23 states, according to a new report from the Trust for American's Health and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
In January 2009, the Coca-Cola Company was served notice of a class-action lawsuit filed by the Center for Science in Public Interest (CSPI) for alleged deceptive and unsubstantiated claims on its Vitaminwater line of beverages. CSPI Litigation Director Steve Gardner said, "Coke fears, probably correctly, that they'll sell less soda as Americans become increasingly concerned with obesity, diabetes and other conditions linked to diets too high in sugar. Vitaminwater is Coke's attempt to dress up soda in a physician's white coat. Underneath, its still sugar water, albeit sugar water that costs about 10 bucks a gallon."
So don't be fooled. These alternatives to soda, marketed as healthy looking drinks, are anything but. Have a club soda – no sugar, no caffeine in that one – and squeeze in some fruit.
FDA warns TNF blockers may increase cancer risk in children, teens
August 5, 2009
The FDA said this week there's an increased risk of lymphoma and other cancers associated with the use of drugs like Remicade (infliximab) and Humira (adalimumab) in children and adolescents. According to the agency, "a new cancer-related warning will be added to the boxed warning that's already on the drugs, which are known as tumor necrosis factor, or TNF, blockers" in order to alert "users to a risk of serious infections that can be fatal."
The drugs work by neutralizing a protein that, when overproduced, causes inflammation and damage to bones, cartilage and other tissue. FDA scientists said that "after more than a year of review ... the drugs appear to increase the risk of cancer after they are used beyond 2 1/2 years." The review of "several dozen reports of cancer in children taking the drugs" showed that "half of the cases were lymphomas."
The FDA began investigating cancer cases linked to the TNF blockers more than 10 years ago. Recently, as part of an Obama administration effort to overhaul healthcare and reduce medical spending, the Department of Health and Human Services was also advised by outside consultants to compare the effectiveness of the arthritis treatments.
While previous safety labeling on TNF blockers included a warning for malignancies, it did not specifically mention leukemia. The updated labels will also reflect the danger of new-onset psoriasis in patients on these drugs. The agency is also "requiring an update to the Warning section of the prescribing information describing reported cases of leukemia in adults, adolescents, and children, as well as additional information on malignancies in children and adolescents.
Dr. Grout's Comment:
This would be a perfect example of medicine which is not "green" or sustainable. We have all good intentions when we try to suppress inflammation, since inflammation causes pain and deformity – particularly when associated with what we diagnose as "juvenile rheumatoid arthritis" or "ulcerative colitis". What parent would not like to see their child out of pain?
The problem is that the body's inflammation is really a cry for help. The pain and inflammation are a response, and a natural consequence, of some transgression – usually dietary, but sometimes chemical – which could be avoided, if we just figured out what was causing the inflammation in the first place. The literature is full of papers associating various treatable inflammatory conditions associated with rheumatoid arthritis: gut inflammation[1], food intolerance[2], chronic infections like klebsiella or mycoplasma[3], insufficient or imbalanced essential fatty acids[4].
Allopathic medicine looks at the "diagnosis" and the symptoms of inflammation and tissue destruction, using pharmaceutical medication which indeed suppresses inflammation, but ultimately leading to chronic infections and tumors because of excessive suppression of inflammation. Green medicine looks at the cause of the inflammation and removes the cause, so that we do not have to deal with the "side effects" of suppression.
[1] Mielants H, De Keyser F. Gut inflammation in the spondyloarthropathies. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2005 Jun;7(3):188-94.
[2] van de Laar MA, van der Korst JK. Food intolerance in rheumatoid arthritis. I. A double blind, controlled trial of the clinical effects of elimination of milk allergens and azo dyes. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1992, Vol 51, 298-302.
[3] Blankenberg-Sprenkels SH, Fielder M et al. Antibodies to Klebsiella pneumoniae in Dutch patients with ankylosing spondylitis and acute anterior uveitis and to Proteus mirabilis in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1998 Apr;25(4):743-7.
[4] Remans PH, Sont JK. Nutrient supplementation with polyunsaturated fatty acids and micronutrients in rheumatoid arthritis: clinical and biochemical effects. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004 Jun;58(6):839-45.
Study says Thimerosal Induces Autism-Like Neurotoxicity
August 4, 2009
A new scientific study proves that the mercury-based compound used as vaccine preservative - known as ‘thimerosal' - induces neural damage similar to that seen in autism patients.
According to the study reported in the June 4th issue of Toxicological & Environmental Chemistry, thimerosal-induced cellular damage caused concentration- and time-dependent mitochondrial damage. Thimerosal at low concentrations induced significant cellular toxicity in human neuronal and fetal cells.
Thimerosal was found to be significantly more toxic than the other metal compounds examined.
Dr. Grout's Comment:
The mountain of evidence against injecting mercury is growing. This study confirms that damage does occur in human nerve cells and cells of the embryo – the baby in the womb. Thimerosal is 49.6 percent ethylmercury. It is well established that mercury exposure causes immune, sensory, neurological, motor, and behavioral dysfunctions - all similar to traits defining, or associated with, autism. The debate ranges whether vaccines containing mercury are a direct cause of autism, or, more likely, just the straw that breaks the camel's back in some cases.
Your genetic makeup determines how well you can excrete mercury. Some people are able to excrete newly ingested mercury in 40 days whereas others require 160 days. The longer it hangs around, the more damage it can do. And of course we are exposed to mercury regularly from coal-burning power plants, cement plants, mining fish, fluorescent light bulbs, pesticides, and dental mercury amalgams – that's the short list.
Mercury, when it combines with lead, creates a synergistic effect that is much worse than either one alone. Some homeopathic physicians feel that mercury holds a special place in the world of toxins because it is especially able to fuel the growth of pathogens.
Unfortunately, the vaccine in the works for Swine Flu will contain thimerosal.
Parents wary of swine flu vaccine
August 2, 2009
CBS news reports that at-risk Americans are being urged to get the swine flu vaccine when it's ready, including 78 million children. "That has some parents worried, not just about the virus, but also about giving their kids yet another vaccine." CBS' LaPook noted, "In recent years, a backlash against vaccines has picked up steam. A vocal minority fears vaccines can cause autism, despite consensus among experts that they don't."
Last week, the Washington Post confirmed that the swine flu vaccine will be made with Thimerosol, a mercury-containing preservative. In some cases, a single vial dose that does not contain Thimerosol will be available.
According to a recent Associated Press-GfK poll, nearly two-thirds said they were likely to give permission for their children to be inoculated at school — if the government's evolving plan to try that pans out. However, only a third of adults say they're very likely to get vaccinated themselves once shots arrive. The poll shows 56 percent of Americans aren't worried that they or their family will catch swine flu. A solid minority — a third of adults and just over one in four parents — opposes swine flu vaccination.
The people most interested in swine flu vaccination are those who get inoculated every year. Four of every five who plan on a regular winter flu shot want the swine flu vaccine, too.
At the direction of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, eight university research hospitals and medical groups across the country will soon enroll 1,000 adults, seniors, and children to test a potential vaccine. The trial will start with 200 healthy adults and 200 seniors. Two strengths of the vaccine will be tested to see which comes closest to triggering an immune response to protect against swine flu. If participants tolerate the vaccines, then researchers will test them on 600 children ages 6 months to 17 years old.
The institute says these trials "are being conducted in a compressed time frame" to beat the onset of the fall flu season.
Dr. Grout's Comment:
The last mass vaccination against swine flu, in 1976, was marred by reports of a paralyzing condition called Guillain-Barre syndrome. Many people find it disquieting to read that the swine flu shot is being "fast-tracked" through the normal safety testing. Others are concerned about yet another dose of the neurotoxin, mercury.
Ginger Taylor, creator of the Adventures in Autism blog, puts it this way:
"Vaccines are pharmaceutical products that carry a risk of injury or death and those risks are greater for some than others. 1 in 6 children in America is learning disabled, 1 in 9 has asthma, 1 in 150 develops autism, 1 in 450 has diabetes, and millions more suffer with allergies and autoimmune disorders. Will the swine flu vaccine be safe for them? Although it is a good idea for health officials to prepare for a worst case scenario and stockpile vaccines, it is a bad idea to turn schools into medical clinics and basically test experimental swine flu vaccines on children first. Especially when nobody has any liability."
Taylor, among others, makes the point that, so far, swine flu in the US has been surprisingly mild. In fact, it's milder than many other strains of flu.
Seasonal flu shots are vigorously promoted each year, but the science suggests they simply don't work very well. Many people come down with the flu shortly after receiving the shot. How does that happen? Because it weakens the immune system, making you more predisposed to the illness.
Get ready for a confusing fall: The regular winter flu is expected to make its usual rounds at the same time swine flu spreads. Those in favor of flu shots will need take two separate vaccinations.
At the Arizona Center for Advanced Medicine, we make use of ultraviolet light to clean the blood of viruses, bacteria, and fungi. We can add ozone to oxidize (kill) the molecules in the shell of the virus. We also make use of vitamin C drips – therapeutic doses flush out viruses. Another option is high-grade colloidal silver – it's renowned germicidal abilities come without the downsides of prescription antibiotics. ACS 200® demonstrates a much broader pathogen kill spectrum than traditional prescription antibiotics, antifungal, or antiviral preparations without damaging human tissue or wiping out good intestinal flora. ACS 200 is proven to kill MRSA in less than 3 minutes.
"Lyme Rage" and a hearing in Washington draw attention to Lyme disease
August 2, 2009
ABC news is reporting a rise in the number of ticks this year. The illness has symptoms that include fever, fatigue and headaches, but if left untreated, Lyme disease can be more serious.
"I'm convinced that Lyme in a chronic form can affect psychiatric issues, neurological issues and you can have neurological problems," New York epidemiologist Dr. Daniel Cameron said.
When Terry Jo Sedlacek went to trial for allegedly gunning down the Rev. Fred Winters in March, the defense cited his Lyme disease infection and it's contribution to what many call "lyme rage."
ABC News medical contributor Dr. Marie Savard, who had Lyme disease, said, "It does affect the central nervous system. You can have behavior changes, personality changes. We have to listen and pay attention."
One of the most contentious issues about Lyme disease is the concept of long-term, chronic Lyme and the use of long-term antibiotics to treat the disease. The Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) does not recognize the existence of chronic Lyme disease, saying the vast majority of Lyme cases can be treated quickly. Lingering symptoms like fatigue and joint pain aren't caused by Lyme, IDSA says, but fall into a category called "medically unexplained symptoms." Many patients vehemently disagree.
A July 30th hearing in Washington, DC, was prompted by an antitrust investigation into Infections Disease Society of America (IDSA) by Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal. Connecticut is home to the town of Lyme, where the disease was first identified. "This is highly unusual: A.G.s don't usually go after esteemed medical organizations," Newsweek reported. But, after hearing from concerned patients, who said IDSA's 2006 treatment guidelines - which recommend against long-term antibiotic treatment and which are used by insurance companies to assess coverage - defined the disease too narrowly and denied people needed, Blumenthal launched his investigation. He "charged that IDSA's guidelines were approved by experts who had conflicts of interest with insurance groups and drug companies."
Dr. Grout's Comment:
The July 30th hearings were the first time in U.S. history that a state attorney general took on a medical society. This was simply unprecedented. After the hearing, Blumenthal said, ""This hearing accomplished a key goal - compelling a fair and full discussion, free of conflicts of interest by panelists, so that all scientific facts and perspectives are considered before medical guidelines are established. Whatever the outcome of today's hearing, the bar has been raised for the IDSA and other medical associations in their development of clinical practice guidelines. Medical practice guidelines are too integral and important to be developed without a rigorous conflicts-free process."
The panel will now assess all information to determine whether the existing guidelines should be maintained, modified or entirely rewritten. The panel expects to complete their review by the end of the year.
This is a move in the right direction, because the debate about chronic Lyme disease has been too fraught with politics. Medical guidelines have profoundly powerful consequences for countless lives, driving doctors' treatment decisions and insurance company coverage determinations. Lyme is now the fastest growing infectious disease, faster than AIDS.
Chronic stress may rewire our brains to act out of habit and ignore changes
August 1, 2009
In addition to making us more irritable, forgetful, and unhealthy, stress also rearranges wiring in the brain, leading to bad decision-making, according to a new study in rats.
Scientists at the University of Minho in Portugal and the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) in Bethesda, Maryland, compared stressed and unstressed rats' responses to two tests. In the first test, they taught the rats to hit a lever to score one of two possible treats: a sip of a sugary solution or a food pellet. The scientists then changed the game, providing the rats with all of the snacks they wanted before giving them the option to press the lever. Satiated, the unstressed rats hit the lever significantly less. But the stressed rats continued pressing at the same rate.
For the second test, the scientists trained the rodents to use two levers, one for each treat. After the rats learned the rules, the researchers picked one treat to dispense randomly, whether or not the rat hit the lever. The relaxed animals hit that treat's lever less often, while the stressed rats continued to hit both levers with equal frequency.
In both experiments, the stressed rats acted out of habit and didn't respond to the changes around them - they were stuck in a rut.
Scientists then looked at a region of the rats' brains called the dorsal striatum. In stressed rats, neurons in the dorsomedial striatum, an area associated with goal-directed behavior (for example, pressing a lever to get a specific treat), had shrunk, making fewer connections to other cells. Meanwhile neurons in the dorsolateral striatum, an area that controls habits (such as pressing the same lever regardless of outcome), had grown and formed more branches. The researchers concluded that chronic stress rewires brain areas involved in the switch between goal-directed and habitual actions. Rui Costa, an NIH neuroscientist and co-author of the study, says that "those changes in the brain bias your behavior tremendously for a while after the stress."
The study provides an animal equivalent to "a frequent, maladaptive feature of human behavior during stress: We fall into doing the same thing ... instead of trying something new," says Robert Sapolsky, a neuroscientist at the Stanford School of Medicine in Palo Alto, California. John Morrison, a neuroscientist at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York City, says that the study is significant because it highlights how stress acts differently on specific brain circuits.
Dr. Grout's Comment:
No wonder we find that we just "can't get out of the rut". No wonder those who are abused and ill-treated keep going back to their abuser. Habit is the only thing they have going for them. The ability to see and make other choices, other decisions, has been altered structurally in the brain. Only by creating new habits – or by structurally altering that neural circuitry – is it possible to get out of the "same old same old" and into new pathways. Neurotherapy can help. Check out the information in the BrainAdvantage article and on the BrainAdvantage website.
Americans spend about $34 billion annually on CAM
August 1, 2009
According to a study conducted by researchers at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH), "while Americans may complain about the high cost of healthcare, they're still willing to shell out roughly $34 billion a year out-of-pocket on alternative therapies that aren't covered by insurance." The findings are based on a survey by the CDC of more than 23,000 adults nationwide.
CAM, complementary and alternative medicine, is a diverse array of medical and health care practices that are not generally considered part of conventional medicine such as the use of nutritional IVs, herbs, and chelation.
Josephine Briggs of the NIH said the results "show why it's important for researchers to conduct rigorous scientific studies of alternative therapies." Briggs pointed out that there has been "speculation that as the number of uninsured grows, there may be increased utilization of some of these approaches, which tend to be relatively inexpensive." While the current report does not cover vitamins and minerals, they "will be addressed in a future one."
Briggs added that researchers aimed to "find out which areas of CAM warrant research by the NIH," and that Americans were surveyed "without regard as to whether any of these alternative or complementary approaches actually work."
Dr. Grout's Comment:
One of the many concerns about the coming federal health care "reform" is the concept of testing various modalities as to what works, and thus, what should be covered by insurance. A valid concern is that the process will be intensely political because of fierce competition and influence from the pharmaceutical industry to maintain the profitable disease management paradigm.
Conventional medicine's approach to determining what works is often the use of double-blind, placebo studies. That's good for comparing one prescription pill against another, yet it is impossible to design a double blind trial with acupuncture and manual therapies, for example. It is hard to identify 'placebo' points in acupuncture and 'placebo' treatment in manual therapies. It also raises ethical questions. A double-blind, placebo approach to the use of chelation for heart disease found few CAM practitioners willing to submit heart disease patients for the placebo portion of the study.
Clinical trials are much better suited for a number of CAM modalities. Each trial follows a written protocol, a detailed plan that explains why the study is needed, what it is intended to do, and how it will be conducted. Clinical trials include Prevention Trials which study ways to reduce the chance that people who are healthy now, but at risk for a disease, will actually develop the disease. Clinical trials also include Early Detection or Screening Trials which study new ways of finding diseases or conditions before they produce signs or symptoms. Although the word "prevention" is bandied about, we aren't hearing about clinical trials in the health care reform discussion.
CAM – some call it Integrated Medicine – offers a much bigger and less destructive toolbox than conventional medicine's reliance on drugs and surgery. That is why the public is voting with its feet and using more CAM. The public consciousness is changing; people are beginning to see that the paradigm of disease management is very different from the more integrative approach with a focus on prevention and health creation.
Study of genetically modified foods causing allergies
August 1, 2009
University of Chicago researchers have been awarded a $433,100 grant by the EPA to investigate how food allergies are triggered. The study could lay the groundwork for assessing whether genetically modified (GM) crops are more likely to cause food allergies than non-GM crops, the agency said – a question that many consumers have been asking.
The incidence of food allergies in the U.S. has doubled over the past decade, according to the Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network. Public concern about the possibility of allergies being triggered by GM crops has centered on inherent insect resistant traits engineered in some GM plants. Officially, scientists do not yet know what has caused the rapid rise in the number of allergy sufferers.
Researchers are focusing on egg and peanut allergens by examining antibodies in mice that have gone through a process which gives them an allergy to the foods.
According to the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, the most common allergies among children are cow's milk, eggs, peanuts, tree nuts, soybeans and wheat. The most common allergies among adults are peanuts, tree nuts, fish, crustaceans, mollusks, fruits and vegetables.
Dr. Grout's Comment:
This study represents a milestone. It is the first time the FDA is acknowledging that there may be a connection to GM foods and the rapidly rising rates of allergies.
Many GM foods are designed to produce pesticides. We, in turn, eat those genetically added pesticides and take them into our bodies. Official U.S. government policy claims that the foods are no different and, most importantly, do not require safety testing.
In May this year, the American Academy of Environmental Medicine (AAEM) called for a moratorium on GM foods, long-term independent studies, and labeling. The AAEM, of which I am a member, called upon "Physicians to educate their patients, the medical community, and the public to avoid GM foods when possible and provide educational materials concerning GM foods and health risks." The AAEM's position paper stated, "Several animal studies indicate serious health risks associated with GM food," including infertility, immune problems, accelerated aging, insulin regulation, and changes in major organs and the gastrointestinal system.
When you put foods with pesticides in the human gut, what happens? Many homeopathic physicians are seeing what we think is evidence that GM foods are damaging the walls of the intestines, breaking apart the integrity of the gut, modifying the intestinal flora, and that is why we see so many cases of leaky gut and allergies.
The gut, or the intestines, is where the bulk of the immune system resides. If GM foods are causing having in the gut, the subsequent damage to the immune system would likely open the door to long term chronic illnesses – the number one burden on the health care system in America.
|

|
|
 |