 |
October 2009 Health in the News Archive
Obama's daughters got both seasonal and swine flu shots
October 29, 2009
According to a statement posted on the White House web site by Catherine McCormick-Lelyveld, press secretary for first lady Michelle Obama, daughters Sasha and Malia received their H1N1 and seasonal flu vaccines last week. The president's daughters received the vaccine "after the vaccine became available to Washington, D.C., schoolchildren."
Dr. Thomas Frieden, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, told reporters that while the H1N1 flu is still widespread across the country, some areas are seeing flu activity start to decrease. He said that having 46 states reporting widespread flu transmission is traditionally the hallmark of the peak of flu season. To have the flu season peak at this time of the year is "extremely unusual." But he said the decrease is patchy, even within some states. He confirmed H1N1 is decreasing in Georgia, which was hit hard when schools reopened in August.
The shortage of vaccines has forced the delay of many mass vaccinations. But according to a new study, the worst may already be over.
"The model predicts that there will be a significant wave in autumn, with 63% of the population being infected, and that this wave will peak so early that the planned vaccination campaign will likely not have a large effect on the total number of people ultimately infected by the pandemic H1N1 influenza virus," the authors wrote in their study.
The study was conducted by professors Sherry Towers and Zhilan Feng of, respectively, Purdue's statistics and mathematics departments, published October 15 in Eurosurveillance, a scientific journal.
Ms. Towers called some comments in the press "a lot of hysteria. In reality, the overwhelming majority of people getting sick are going to have a mild illness."
On October 24, President Obama declared a national emergency to deal with the "rapid increase in illness" from the H1N1 influenza virus. An administration official said the move is "not tied to the current case count" and gives the federal government more power to help states by lifting bureaucratic requirements - both in treating patients and moving equipment to where it's most needed.
Dr. Grout's Comment:
When I saw this news, I thought to myself: "Well, what else is he going to do? He is the leader of the country; the conventional wisdom states that swine flu vaccination is the way to go. It's probably a battle that he chose not to fight. I would have chosen otherwise, but I am not the President of the United States, fortunately, so I don't have to worry about what half the country and all the vaccine manufacturers and pharmaceutical companies think."
American Cancer Society's about-face on screenings
October 23, 2009
The American Cancer Society, which has long been a staunch defender of most cancer screening, is now quietly working on a new message to emphasize that screening for cancers can come with a real risk of overtreating many small cancers while missing cancers that are deadly.
"We don't want people to panic," said Dr. Otis Brawley, chief medical officer of the cancer society. "But I'm admitting that American medicine has overpromised when it comes to screening. The advantages to screening have been exaggerated."
The cancer society's decision to reconsider its message was spurred in part by an analysis published Wednesday in The Journal of the American Medical Association, Dr. Brawley said. In it, researchers report a 40 percent increase in breast cancer diagnoses and a near doubling of early stage cancers, but just a 10 percent decline in cancers that have spread beyond the breast to the lymph nodes or elsewhere in the body.
If breast and prostate cancer screening really fulfilled their promise, the researchers note, cancers would now be found early, when they could be cured. A large increase in early cancers would be balanced by a commensurate decline in late-stage cancers. That is what happened with screening for colon and cervical cancers. But not with breast and prostate cancer.
For now, those risks are not emphasized in the cancer society's mammogram message which states that a mammogram is "one of the best things a woman can do to protect her health."
Dr. Grout's Comment:
Mammography is far from a perfect screening tool. It was never good for women with dense breasts, implants, or women pregnant or nursing. One risk of mammography is that if you do have a cancerous mass, the last thing you want to do is to squeeze it which can cause the cancer to spread. Another risk is that annual mammograms deliver an annual dose of radiation, and radiation is carcinogenic. In fact, the only acknowledged cause of cancer by the American Cancer Society is radiation.
Many groups like the Susan G. Komen society have radiologists on the board of directors. Radiologists invested in mammography machines and have not wanted to switch to thermography. Lobbying efforts brought about the removal of thermography coverage by insurance companies. And that's unfortunate because thermography can spot suspicious tissue sometimes 10 years before it can be detected by mammography.
Cancer cells are typically in the body 10-20 years before the mass gets large enough to be noticed. When a tumor is forming, it develops its own blood supply to feed its accelerated growth and this increased blood flow can increase the surface temperatures of the breast. Pre-cancerous tissues can start this process well in advance of the cells becoming malignant. Thermography measures the skin's autonomic response to that inflammation it's "heat signature."
Modern thermography is the cancer society's answer to screening that can help raise suspicions of breast cancer at an early stage, when there is still chance of complete cure.
HMF in high fructose corn syrup linked to DNA damage in humans
October 22, 2009
Researchers from the USDA Agricultural Research Service in Tucson, Arizona, joined with others established the conditions that foster formation of potentially dangerous levels of a toxic substance in the high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) often fed to honey bees. Their study could also keep the substance out of soft drinks and dozens of other human foods that contain HFCS.
When HFCS is heated, it forms a substance called hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) that is toxic to bees. HFCS is fed to bees and the speculation is that it contributes to the Bee Colony Collapse that has killed at least one-third of the honeybee population in the United States.
The scientists measured levels of HMF in HFCS products from different manufacturers over a period of 35 days at different temperatures. As temperatures rose, levels of HMF increased steadily. Levels jumped dramatically at about 120 degrees Fahrenheit. "The data are important for commercial beekeepers, for manufacturers of HFCS, and for purposes of food storage. Because HFCS is incorporated as a sweetener in many processed foods, the data from this study are important for human health as well," the report states. It adds that studies in Sweden have linked HMF to DNA damage in humans. In addition, HMF breaks down in the body to other substances daughter metabolites potentially more harmful than the original substance.
Dr. Grout's Comment:
HFCS is a processed, liquid sweetener used generously throughout the food supply. It is in a long list of processed foods many people consume every day including juice, sodas, salad dressings, peanut butter, and ketchup. But more worrisome, it is in many things that will get heated again like bread and pizza sauce. Many were already calling HFCS the worst of all non-synthetic sweeteners because it is metabolized to fat in the body far more rapidly than any other sugar, and most HFCS is made from genetically modified corn which has it own set of health concerns. The state of Florida even went so far as trying to ban HFCS from schools in 2006.
It pays to read labels.
Dr. Andrew Weil rebuked by FDA for swine flu claims
October 21, 2009
The Federal Drug Administration sent a warning letter to Dr. Andrew Weil and others that their websites made marketing claims that "unapproved/uncleared/unauthorized" products could "diagnose, mitigate, prevent, treat or cure" the H1N1 flu virus in human beings.
The FDA and the FTC reviewed www.drweil.com on October 13. "The FDA has determined that your website offers a product for sale that is intended to diagnose, mitigate, prevent, treat or cure the H1N1 Flu Virus in people. This product has not been approved, cleared, or otherwise authorized by FDA for use in the diagnosis, mitigation, prevention, treatment, or cure of the H1N1 Flu Virus. This product is your Immune Support Formula. On a product webpage describing the Immune Support Formula: The Immune Support Formula contains astragalus. . . . Astragalus ... is used traditionally to ward off colds and flu and has been well studied for its antiviral and immunity-enhancing properties.'"
Alyson Saben, deputy director of the FDA's Office of Enforcement, said, "It's very important that consumers know these products can be deceptive and risky. They offer a false sense of protection and could delay someone from seeking treatment."
Dr. Weil responded: "Many of the outlets on the [recipients'] list promoted products that were unethical and clearly egregious violations of FDA standards, including counterfeit versions of pharmaceuticals such as Tamiflu
The content that was called into question [on www.drweil.com] in the warning was primarily educational, including comments about ingredients in Weil Lifestyle and other supplements which may help support a healthy immune system."
He continued that because "it was suggested that particular traditional herbal ingredients may provide some protection against flu, it was the opinion of the FDA/FTC that the language was in violation of current standards. I directed the website team to remove the FDA/FTC-referenced content for review, and they have done so. I fully support the FDA/FTC task force in its efforts."
Some retailers were puzzled why regulators would go after their swine flu remedies but leave their similarly marketed products for other illnesses alone.
Dr. Grout's Comment:
The majority of the FDA/FTC warning letters involved dietary supplements. The rest cited an array of products ranging from air and water filters, to biohazard kits and fake "Tamiflu" pills from India. But Dr. Weil was selling a legitimate product, saying essentially that boosting the immune system can offer some protection against swine flu.
Earlier this year, a Swine Flu task force initiated by the FDA and the FTC essentially made it illegal to make ANY claim that any product for sale has any effect on swine flu other than pharmaceutical drugs. The government is prosecuting this more aggressively than questionable cancer claims.
Dr. Weil's site raises the issue of just how much suppression of natural approaches is part of the FDA's agenda. Who can forget the 2008 episode when the FDA threatened legal action against 29 companies that market cherries? The FDA demanded they stop using scientific information describing the health benefits of natural cherries, such as the anthocyanins that reduce inflammation for arthritis sufferers.
Taking bogus Tamiflu pills off the market is the government's job, but censoring the concept that a strong immune system makes human beings healthier is just plain wrong.
Public resistance to swine flu vaccination grows
October 18, 2009
On October 16, a New York State Supreme Court judge issued a restraining order against the state from enforcing the controversial mandatory vaccination.
This came about as a result of a lawsuit by the Public Employees Federation, the New York State United Teachers, and an attorney representing four Albany, NY nurses, who sought to reverse the policy that required New York hospital workers to get the swine flu vaccine or face termination. The suit argued that the state Health Commissioner had overstepped his authority.
The Supreme Court ruled that the vaccination for nurses, doctors, aides, and non-medical staff members who might be in contact with patients, remain voluntary.
Additionally, on October 15, a group of health freedom advocates, including Dr. Gary Null and other New York health care workers, filed an emergency injunction in the US District Court for the District of Columbia to prevent the distribution of the swine flu vaccine, and to void the FDA swine flu vaccine approvals already granted on September 15. The suit alleges that the government failed to follow its own rules and applicable legislation in rushing the vaccine approvals in the absence of any of the requisite minimum scientifically sound and appropriate testing for both safety and effectiveness as required by law since 1964. The Plaintiffs further allege that the Live Attenuated Influenza Virus nasal mist vaccine could trigger the very pandemic the government claims people should fear.
As of October 11, 2009 the World Health Organization reported that there have been more than 399,232 laboratory confirmed cases of pandemic influenza H1N1, and 4,735 deaths worldwide.
Dr. Grout's Comment:
To put that in perspective, consider that malaria kills one million people every year, worldwide.
The British Medical Journal published a comparative analysis of several flu pandemics, saying the evidence shows that the H1N1 swine flu is of "the same subtype as seasonal H1N1 that has been circulating since 1977." The author asks, "What is the proper response to clinically mild or epidemiologically limited (small number) outbreaks caused by new viruses? Over the past four years, pandemic preparations have focused on responding to worst case scenarios. As a result, officials responded to the H1N1 outbreak as an unfolding disaster. Measures were taken that in hindsight may be seen as alarmist, overly restrictive, or even unjustified."
The November issue of The Atlantic Monthly had an article questioning, "What if everything we think we know about fighting influenza is wrong? What if flu vaccines do not protect people from dying? Where does that leave us if a bad pandemic strikes?"
Great question. Health officials have already reported H1N1 resistance to Tamiflu.
Herbicide Atrazine is a Common Water Contaminant
October 7, 2009
The Environmental Protection Agency is expected to announce this week that it will conduct a new evaluation of atrazine. It is an herbicide often used on corn fields, golf courses, and lawns. It has become one of the most common contaminants in American drinking water.
Atrazine is a hormone mimicker that has been around since the 1950s. Professor Tyrone Hayes at UC Berkeley found that 3ppm in water, 3 times less than what the EPA considers 'safe' for humans, will cause the development of ovaries and mature eggs in male frogs.
On a cellular level, atrazine's gender-bending effects stem from its effects on estrogen. Researchers have shown that it tells the body to step up production of the enzyme aromatase which converts the male hormone testosterone into the female hormone estrogen.
Despite calls over the years to ban it, the EPA has been mum, until now. The EPA is preparing a new evaluation of atrazine to assess any possible links between it and cancer, as well as other health problems, such as premature births. The EPA may determine that new restrictions are necessary. Seven countries in the European Union have banned atrazine. Water systems in six states - Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Mississippi and Ohio - recently sued atrazine's manufacturers to force them to pay for removing the chemical from drinking water.
The decision by EPA administrator Lisa P. Jackson, who took over the agency in January, is a significant departure from the agency's policies under President George W. Bush.
Dr. Grout's Comment:
The EPA could do much to reduce the costs of health care by reducing toxins in our environment. To do that would be an honest to goodness case of prevention. There are more than 400 pesticides legally used in the USA. Apples, for example, can be sprayed up to 16 times with 36 different pesticides.
According to the Department of Health and Human Services, organophosphate pesticides (OP) are now found in the blood of 95% of Americans tested, and the levels are twice as high in blood samples taken from children. Exposure to OPs is linked to hyperactivity, behavior disorders, learning disabilities, developmental delays and motor dysfunction.
What about using natural selection, and natural pesticides which appear to co-exist happily with humans on the planet? Chrysanthemums, for example, are a natural pesticide used for thousands of years in China. So too are tobacco and ladybugs. People are flocking to organic foods to avoid synthetic, toxic chemicals because they are beginning to realize that their children's health is at stake. Our "living better through chemistry" approach is literally killing us.
Prevention may not cut healthcare costs
October 7, 2009
Bloomberg News reports both Democrats and Republicans are asserting in the healthcare debate that "prevention saves money." But economists and policy analysts who study the issue say it doesn't work that way. "Most politicians all along the political spectrum have said we'll save money by giving preventive care, and I don't think that's ever been shown to work," says Uwe Reinhardt, an economics and public affairs professor at Princeton University in New Jersey. Reinhardt, has advised Congress on how to cut health-care costs. He and Victor Fuchs, a health-care economist at Stanford University in California, both say the expense of more tests for more healthy people exceeds the savings generated by early treatment of the cases caught.
Dr. Grout's comment:
They don't get it. This assumes that "prevention" means lots of (expensive) tests for "early diagnosis." By the time a test shows that there is an illness, it's too late for prevention the train has already left the station, the horse is out of the barn. Prevention means a clean environment and eating healthy foods from childhood, which means finding an economically viable way to educate parents. The only time lawmakers envision prevention as something other than tests is when they talk about smoking. Ah, yes, cutting out cigarettes makes us healthier. What if we cut out high fructose corn syrup, synthetic sugars, and trans fats?
According to the CDC, three-quarters of health care spending now goes to treat preventable chronic diseases. Most of these diseases have their roots in diet and environmental toxins. "The American way of eating has become the elephant in the room," as Michael Pollen recently said. We need the political will to take a much firmer stand on what constitutes "food", and on what the government is willing to pay for with food stamps. It means refusing to allow chemicals and additives into the food chain. It means making foods that have more omega-3 fatty acids and a shorter shelf life. It's a different way of thinking. We cannot afford any longer to travel the same old path, and expect to arrive at a different destination.
Unsafe Levels of Toxins Found in Drinking Water at Schools
October 7, 2009
An Associated Press investigation found that drinking water at thousands of public and private schools in all 50 states is contaminated with unsafe levels of lead, pesticides, and dozens of other toxins. The contamination comes from well water and from public utilities.
"It's an outrage," said Marc Edwards, an engineer at Virginia Tech who has been honored for his work on water quality. "If a landlord doesn't tell a tenant about lead paint in an apartment, he can go to jail. But we have no system to make people follow the rules to keep school children safe?"
The EPA says the number of violations spiked over the last decade largely because the government has gradually adopted stricter standards for contaminants such as arsenic and some disinfectants. The EPA does not have the authority to require testing for all schools and can only provide guidance on environmental practices.
Many of the same toxins could also be found in water at homes, offices and businesses. But the contaminants are especially dangerous to children, who drink more water per pound than adults and are more vulnerable to the effects of many hazardous substances.
In California's farm belt, wells at some schools are so tainted with pesticides that students have taken to stuffing their backpacks with bottled water for fear of getting sick from the drinking fountain.
The AP analysis has "clearly identified the tip of an iceberg," said Gina Solomon, a San Francisco physician who serves on an EPA drinking water advisory board. "This tells me there is a widespread problem that needs to be fixed because there are ongoing water quality problems in small and large utilities, as well."
Dr. Grout's Comment:
We know that babies are born with some 200 chemicals in their bodies. We also know that the "body burden" of toxics build over time and contribute to chronic disease. Contaminated water is one way the body burden increases. Many schools have turned to buying bottled water because it is less expensive than fixing old pipes or trying to find clean well water. But bottled water itself is a problem. Throwing away all that plastic is bad for the environment, and tests show that many bottled waters are not free of contaminants.
In the "old days," kids used to get water at schools from drinking fountains. Is it impossible to filter that water? Some experts say we can only mitigate the problem, no filter has been designed that can get rid of everything we'd like to get rid of. Contaminated water is an unfortunate legacy of mankind's footprint on the earth.
Autism Rates Are Officially Increasing
October 6, 2009
Two new studies report one in 91 children in the United States has autism spectrum disorder. Boys are four times more likely than girls to be diagnosed; one in 58.
The first report is published in the journal Pediatrics. A second report, from the CDC, is forthcoming. The CDC announced Friday that it has also found about 1 in 100 children have ASD. Its findings radically adjust the previous statistic that put the rate at one in 150 estimated prevalence. The new estimate would mean about 673,000 American children have autism. Previous estimates put the number at about 560,000. The life-time medical cost of dealing with Autism Spectrum Disorder is put at $1.6 million. The ASD-related costs borne by the health care system rose 142 percent from 2000 to 2004.
Lee Grossman, CEO of Autism Society, USA, said "This national study charts a dramatic rise in the prevalence of autism in the United States and we applaud this administration's recognition that autism is an urgent public health priority. But families today are asking: how high must these prevalence rates rise before the nation responds?"
Congressman Chris Smith (R-NJ), co-chair of the Congressional Autism Caucus, said "Congress must ensure robust funding to support aggressive programs of research, education, and services. Furthermore, Congress needs to enact additional legislation, such as the Autism Treatment Acceleration Act of 2009, that will establish the infrastructure and mechanisms for delivering appropriate services across the lifespan to individuals with autism and their families. We must look to maximize the reach and impact of our investments and activities by closely coordinating government efforts with those of national advocacy organizations, such as the Autism Society."
Dr. Grout's Comment:
Are these new numbers a real increase, or as some want to say, mostly just better reporting or expansion of the ASD classification within the public schools? I don't think that is as important as figuring out how to reduce the incidence of autism and lost potential that comes with it.
In 1999, mercury was removed from many vaccines. Yet the rates increase. This lends credence to the school of thought that autism follows an overload of toxicity. Newborn babies have some 200 chemicals in their blood and that "body burden" increases as they grow up. A vaccine, which interacts with the immune system, is sometimes the straw that breaks the camel's back. Autism is an unfortunate combination of exposure to more toxins than the system can handle, and genetic susceptibility. Some of us excrete mercury and other toxins better than others. Chelation has proven successful for many children because it significantly decreases the inflammation caused by heavy metal contaminants.
Some physicians remain hesitant about H1N1 vaccine
October 6, 2009
The CDC reported today that every state has ordered the H1N1 flu vaccine and the first 2.5 million doses are now available. The agency says the vaccine is perfectly safe. ABC News reported that "some doctors are telling patients to hold off on getting vaccinated." They argue, "We don't know how well [the vaccine] works."
ABC News spoke to doctors "who are very reluctant about this vaccine." While the opinion is not widespread, some argue "that this vaccine has been rushed to market, and not fully tested." But ABC notes, "This vaccine is made in the exact same way as seasonal flu vaccine by the same companies, in the same factories, by the same procedures, with the same safety standards, with the same testing."
Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said that while the H1N1 virus that is circulating now produces "a relatively mild to, at most, moderate influenza" in most people, "the people who get into trouble are highly disproportionately young people," and the "striking thing" about those "who get hospitalized and sometimes die...is that you never see that in seasonal flu."
Frieden also said that "influenza is widespread in most of the United States, with the incidence continuing to increase in some states and to decline very slightly in others. About 2.4 million doses of the intranasal vaccine FluMist are now available, and states have already ordered 2.2 million doses. Next week, an injectable vaccine will also become available.
Dr. Grout's Comment:
Well, it is finally being reported that not every physician is as sold on the H1N1 vaccine as the government would suggest. The vaccine is untested, contains adjuvants, is preserved with thimerosal - a mercury compound and might protect us against what has been a relatively mild form of influenza in most people. I personally cannot think of a really good reason for me to vaccinate myself or my family.
Fat Deficiency Kills More People than Breast Cancer
October 5, 2009
Low omega-3 intake plays a role in about 84,000 deaths annually, according to new Harvard University research supported by the CCD. Contrast that with the estimate of 40,610 who will die from breast cancer in 2009.
Harvard University researchers looked at 12 dietary, lifestyle, and metabolic risk factors such as tobacco smoking and high blood pressure, and used a mathematical model to determine how many fatalities could have been prevented if better practices had been observed. They also found that high dietary trans fatty acids play role in about 82,000 deaths annually.
Another study, published in the Journal of Hypertension, found that a combination of omega-3 fatty acids and coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) can decrease blood pressure and heart rate in kidney disease patients. People with chronic kidney disease, which increases the risk of heart disease two- to 50-fold, experienced improvements in both blood pressure and heart rate following supplementation with four grams of omega-3 fatty acids.
Furthermore, researchers from University of Western Australia and Royal Perth Hospital reported that when omega-3 is taken in combination with CoQ10, the blood pressure reducing benefits were enhanced, despite CoQ10 alone not being associated with any improvements on its own.
Dr. Grout's Comment:
In Great Britain, the Food Standards Agency this week considered what claims can be made about omega-3s on labels. Some of the world's leading omega-3 scientists are concerned that labels need to help consumers distinguish between marine-sourced EPA (eicosapentaenoic acid) and DHA (docosahexaenoic acid) and plant-based ALA (alpha-linolenic acid) because only the fish-derived omega-3s have the scientific backing for their health benefits. ALA from plant oils is cheaper, but does not deliver the wider range of health benefits.
Omega-3 fatty acids, most notably DHA (docosahexaenoic acid) and EPA (eicosapentaenoic acid), have been linked to a wide-range of health benefits, including reduced risk of heart disease, some cancers, good development of a baby during pregnancy, joint health, and improved behaviour and mood. A University of Barcelona study earlier this year showed diets rich in omega-3 fatty acids protect the liver from damage caused by obesity and the insulin resistance it provokes.
The Harvard study found that most deaths linked to a lack of healthy omega-3s are from heart diseases. Omega-3 fatty acids are a type of unsaturated fatty acid that reduces inflammation throughout the body. Many of the anti-inflammatory and clot-inhibiting prostaglandins are made from omega-3 fatty acids, of which there are very few in commercial vegetable oils, or indeed in fruits, vegetables, farmed fish, and eggs raised by modern farming methods.
These studies, and those that follow, will hopefully put an end to the low-fat diet fad. Fats have been demonized for the last 40 years or more. And yet Americans are more overweight and more prone to chronic disease than ever before, due in part to misinformation about fats.
GM sugar beets ruled illegal
October 1, 2009
The US government illegally approved a genetically modified, herbicide-resistant strain of sugar beets without adequately considering the chance they will contaminate other beet crops, a federal judge ruled September 21.
The ruling by U.S. District Judge Jeffrey White rejected the U.S. Department of Agriculture's decision in 2005 to allow Monsanto Co. to sell "Roundup-Ready" sugar beets.
White said the USDA, in concluding that the new crop would have no significant environmental effects, discounted the likelihood that wind-borne pollen would spread to fields where conventional sugar beets, table beets and the beet variety known as Swiss chard are grown.
Planting genetically modified sugar beets has a "significant effect" on the environment, White said in his ruling Monday, because of "the potential elimination of a farmer's choice to grow non-genetically engineered crops, or a consumer's choice to eat non-genetically engineered food." The judge said the department must prepare an environmental impact statement, which would include public input.
The ruling "sends a very clear message to the USDA to protect American farmers and consumers and not the interests of Monsanto," said Kevin Golden, a San Francisco attorney for the nonprofit Center for Food Safety, which opposes genetically modified foods and supports organic farming.
Luther Markwart, spokesman for the 10,000-member American Sugar Beet Growers Association, said the group is "looking forward to aggressively advocating" for farmers who want to use the altered beets. Industry surveys suggest that 95 percent of the sugar beets planted this year were genetically modified. Beets supply about half the nation's sugar, with the rest coming from sugar cane.
Dr. Grout's Comment:
A different federal judge made a similar ruling in 2007; Judge Charles Breyer ordered a halt to the nationwide planting of Monsanto's genetically engineered strain of alfalfa until the USDA conducted an environmental study. A federal appeals court upheld Breyer's decision last year. There is still no environmental study and the alfalfa, with rare exceptions, is not being grown.
A telling comment was made by David Berg, president of American Crystal Sugar Company, the nation's largest sugar beet processor. He said food companies had accepted the biotech beets. "They've been a big nonevent in terms of customer acceptance." I think he clearly misspoke. There was a lot of consumer pushback. This lawsuit was spearheaded by the Center for Food Safety and was joined by the Sierra Club, the Organic Seed Alliance, and High Mowing Organic Seeds, a small seed company. The defendant was the Department of Agriculture.
|

|
|
 |