Arizona Center for Advanced Medicine - Martha M. Grout, MD, MD(H)
Scottsdale, Arizona    480.240.2600
Arizona Center for Advanced Medicine
HOMEPAGE
Arizona Center for Advanced Medicine
MEDICAL SERVICES
Scottsdale homeopathic doctor
OUR MEDICAL TEAM
Arizona Center for Advanced Medicine
LOCATION and CONTACT
Arizona alternative medicine
RESOURCE LIBRARY
Arizona alternative medicine
INSURANCE QUESTIONS
Arizona alternative medicine
SEARCH THE SITE
Arizona alternative medicine
RECOMMENDED LINKS
Phoenix alternative doctor
FREE CONSULTATION

If you would like to schedule a 15 minute phone consultation at no charge with us to determine how we can help you, call 480-240-2600. If you want to send us a brief description of the issue you would like help with, email info@Arizona
AdvancedMedicine.com

Find us on Facebook

An Alphabet of Good Health in a Sick World by Martha M. Grout MD, MD(H) and Mary Budinger
An Alphabet Of Good Health
In A Sick World

-

February 2009 Health in the News Archive

[ Monthly Index of New Briefs ]


Fewer Women Are Having Mammograms

February 18, 2009

Mammography use has declined the last 10 years in nearly two-thirds of the states, according to a new study from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The study was published in the February issue of the American Journal of Roentgenology.

The CDC's data analysis showed that mammography use, from 2000-2006 fell in 34 states including Utah, South Carolina, New Mexico and Delaware. It increased slightly in 17 states -- including Minnesota, Tennessee, Georgia and Alabama. But it fell in 34 states including Utah, South Carolina, New Mexico and Delaware.

"Women in these areas may not have a convenient place to go," Dr. Jacqueline Miller, the study's lead author, said. "Also, reports have shown that insurance co-pays were related to women not getting their mammogram, and we know that some insurance companies have increased their co-pay requirements. When there are more out-of-pocket costs, women start weighing the costs of screening against other competing factors."

There is also a shortage of radiologists in breast imaging that is related to heightened malpractice lawsuit concerns. A number of mammography centers have closed due to potential litigation issues.

Dr. Grout's Comment:
One might expect that if mammography is a good tool, and if fewer women are using it, then cancer rates would have gone up. But the rates went down.

The CDC study states that "Breast cancer incidence and mortality rates have declined." Their data show that breast cancer rates fell in 50 states between 2000 and 2004.

I think women are getting smarter. They hear from their friends about the number of false positives leading to unnecessary and frightening biopsies. They hear about the number of cancers missed. More women are questioning whether an annual dose of radiation encourages the growth of cancer. And more women are learning that the compression applied during a mammogram can actually rupture small blood vessels that support the cancer, causing the cancer to spread.

Thermography has no radiation, no painful compression of the breast, and thermography can detect suspicions of cancer 8-10 years earlier than mammography. If a tumor is large enough to be detected by a mammogram, it is usually in an advanced stage. If early detection is your goal, thermography is clearly the better choice.

The study says, "Mammography is currently the most effective way to detect breast cancer at an early stage when it is most treatable." But that simply isn't true. The CDC and even the Susan G. Komen organization dish out the old dogma about mammograms. No nation other than the U.S. recommends routine mammography for premenopausal women. This is a clear case of marketing and money winning out over health, not unlike the American Dental Association which still recommends mercury fillings, even though they have been banned elsewhere in the world. But women are wising up and seeing for themselves that thermography is a better alternative. Thermography's use is growing.

Read more about thermography.

America reverses course on environmental mercury

February 18, 2008

The Obama Administration announced its support yesterday for a legally-binding global treaty to phase out the use of toxic mercury, which it described as the world's gravest chemical problem.

The policy reversal was unveiled by the U.S. deputy assistant secretary of state for environment and sustainable development, Daniel Reifsnyder, at the start of a major U.N. gathering of environment ministers in Kenya.

About 6,000 tons of mercury enter the environment every year, about a third generated by power stations and coal fires. Much settles into the oceans where it enters the food chain and is concentrated in predatory fish like tuna. Some of it we inhale every day. Increased coal use in Asia means emissions may be rising, U.N. Environment Programme (UNEP) experts fear.

"Neither the United States, nor any other country, can achieve sufficient reductions of mercury risks to protect the health of its citizens without serious cooperation internationally to reduce global mercury emissions," Reifsnyder said.

Dr. Grout's Comment:
We talk of needing to lower health care costs – this is definitely a move in the right direction. I find elevated levels of mercury in almost everyone I test. One man recently came to me for chelation after a minor heart attack; his mercury level was literally off the chart. He is about to have his mercury fillings removed. We know mercury is a factor in heart disease and it feeds chronic inflammation which fuels so many chronic diseases.

Mercury is a heavy metal known to damage the human nervous system and cause liver damage and memory loss. Children and fetuses are particularly vulnerable to mercury poisoning; it can cause birth defects, brain damage and peeling skin. Mercury toxicity gave rise to the phrase, "Mad as a hatter" because a century ago, mercury was used in making felt hats. Hatters and mill workers often suffered neurological damage - confused speech and distorted vision – from breathing mercury fumes. Many died early as a result of mercury poisoning.

I applaud this effort to lessen the amount of mercury in our environment. Perhaps now we can begin to shift the conversation about the toxicity of mercury in vaccines.

Artificial sweeteners linked to weight gain

February 15, 2009

Whether you call them calorie free sweeteners or sugar substitutes, many "experts" advised us to eat diet foods with artificial sweeteners to curb the obesity epidemic.

"Apparently we were wrong," says Professor Susan Swithers of Purdue University. She says, "It's temping to think that by simply consuming a food that has fewer calories, that body weight gain and food intake are automatically going to go down. Our data suggest that, in fact, the opposite might happen. When (the rats) got a sweet-tasting food that didn't deliver those calories, they then overindulged in their regular food as a consequence."

A Purdue University study was done on two groups of rats. One group was given artificially sweetened yogurt and the other group was given yogurt with glucose, a natural sweetener high in calories. The rats given the artificial sweetener gained 20 percent more weight.

Researchers say the artificial sweetener somehow interrupts the body's ability to regulate or register the amount of calories it has consumed. As a result, metabolism slows down and does not burn as many calories. Problems with self-regulation might explain in part why obesity has risen in parallel with the use of artificial sweeteners "The data clearly indicate that consuming a food sweetened with no-calorie saccharin can lead to greater body-weight gain and adiposity than would consuming the same food sweetened with a higher-calorie sugar," the authors wrote.

Dr. Grout's Comment:
The pitfalls of trying to fool Mother Nature. Here is yet another study showing that artificial sugar substitutes are hurting, not helping the obesity epidemic.

And it is not just an issue of weight. Artificial sweeteners have been shown to invite a host of problems ranging from seizures to cancer.

aspartameThe consumer education group Citizens for Health follows each study and is demanding that the FDA revoke its approval of sucralose, marketed as Splenda, because it suppresses beneficial bacteria and directly affects the expression of isozymes that are known to interfere with the bioavailability of drugs and nutrients.

Asparatame has generated more complaints to the FDA than any other food additive.

Stopping the sugar habit isn't something most people can do cold turkey because it is addictive. Scientists have found the brain responds to sugar not unlike how it responds to heroin and cocaine.

If you have candida, it is almost impossible to kick the sugar habit until you knock down the fungus. Call us to help you fight the impediments to stopping sugar and sugar substitutes.

Court ruling finds absolutely no autism- vaccine connection

February 12, 2009

Today the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (Vaccine Court) ruled that the combination of the MMR vaccine and thimerosal in other vaccines did not cause or contribute to the cause of neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism in the cases of Cedillo, Hazelhurst, Snyder v. Secretary of Health and Human Services.

"It was abundantly clear that petitioners' theories of causation were speculative and unpersuasive," said the court. Three families - the Cedillos, the Hazelhursts and the Snyders – lost their case as the panel ruled that they had not presented sufficient evidence.

To win, attorneys for the three families had to show it was more likely than not that the autism symptoms in the children were directly related to a combination of the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) shots and other shots that at the time carried a mercury-containing preservative called thimerosal.

But the court concluded that "the weight of scientific research and authority" was "simply more persuasive on nearly every point in contention."

Under the federal law, citizens do not have the ability to individually sue vaccine makers. Vaccine claims are reviewed by special masters serving on the U.S. Court of Claims. More than 5500 claims have been filed with that court. Today's ruling is a blow to the concept that toxicity from vaccines contributes to neurological disorders. The ruling also diminishes chances that any damages will be paid by the federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program to parents of children who feel vaccines caused harm. Compensation is capped at $250,000 plus attorney's fees.

The court still has to rule on separate claims from other families who contend that, rather than a specific vaccine combination, the lone culprit could be thimerosal, a preservative that is no longer in most routine children's vaccines. For each theory, there were to be three test cases.

But in Thursday's rulings, the court may have sent a signal on those future cases: "The petitioners have failed to demonstrate that thimerosal-containing vaccines can contribute to causing immune dysfunction," one of the court's special masters wrote.

The head of one consumer group that questions vaccine safety, the National Vaccine Information Center, said the court's ruling will do little to change the minds of most parents who suspect a link between vaccines and autism. "I think it is a mistake to conclude that, because these few test cases were denied compensation, it's been decided vaccines don't play any role in regressive autism," said Barbara Loe Fisher, the center's president.

"I'm devastated today," said Rebecca Estepp, of the organization Talk About Curing Autism. "But I also know that the decision will be appealed. "As parents, we feel like, OK, we're going to fight even harder to get justice for our children," she added. "In a way this might have reignited our cause... Just because we lost today does not mean we will lose in the future."

The plaintiffs have a 30-day window to consider the grounds upon which they may contest the decision, and an appeal is likely.

Dr. Paul Offit of the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, said, "It's a great day for science, it's a great day for America's children when the court rules in favor of science." Offit has received compensation from the pharmaceutical industry.

Dr. Grout's Comment:
I think we are still in a stage of denial as has happened throughout the history of medicine. In a classic case, Dr. Ignaz Semmelweis recognized the transmission of infection from one maternity patient to another by the physicians who carried "something" from one delivery room to another in the 1840s. Despite his extraordinary success by simply cleaning his hands before going from one room to the next, he was met with intense ostracism from his peers. Semmelweis' claims were thought to lack scientific basis; Pasteur had not come along yet.

More recently, every doctor knew stomach ulcers were caused by too much acid, too much stress. Milk and radical surgeries were the answer for decades. Australian scientists hypothesized that most stomach ulcers were caused by the bacteria H. pylori; their peers sneered. Some 20 years later, the pair was awarded the Nobel Prize for Medicine. And there are many, many such stories in between.

Today the National Vaccine Information Center published an editorial that says, in part, "drug companies marketing vaccines have a major influence on what gets published and is said about vaccines in medical journals. It is no wonder that there are almost no studies published in the medical literature that call into question vaccine safety."

Hannah PolingToday's brash interpretation of "the science" is disappointing. This ruling assumes that every infant's immune system is comparable, yet in the Hannah Poling case decided last year, the court found that she had an underlying disorder of the mitochondria whereby she was not able to detox the mercury. The government acknowledged that low cellular energy can increase the risk of immune system overdrive, and regression into autism.

Not all children have robust detoxification systems. Why is that so difficult to comprehend?

For an interesting perspective on how mercury was linked to autism decades ago, read this UPI article.

Mediterranean diet may reduce risk of mild cognitive impairment

February 11, 2009

According to a study published in the Feb. issue of the Archives of Neurology, following the Mediterranean diet which is rich in fruits, vegetables, fish, and olive oil appears to reduce "the risk of getting mild cognitive impairment," and also appears to "cut the risk of developing Alzheimer's disease if cognitive impairment is already present." For the study, researchers from Columbia University Medical Center evaluated nearly 1,400 people without cognitive impairment and 482 people with mild cognitive impairment, and then followed them for an average of 4.5 years. The participants -- average age 77 -- also completed a food frequency questionnaire, detailing what they had eaten during the past year. The authors found that participants who ate the diet "to a moderate degree had 17 percent less risk of developing mild cognitive impairment," and "those who adhered a lot had a 28 percent less risk of developing mild cognitive impairment.

Dr. Grout's comment:
Let's hear it for diet and lifestyle! So when there is mild cognitive impairment – memory loss – the risk of developing true Alzheimer's dementia is significantly reduced if a healthy diet is followed. And if we also do brain training to increase the blood supply and neural connections in the frontal lobes, then we can even begin to reverse the cognitive impairment – no longer just a holding action, but an actual improvement.

Sales reports suggest Americans turn to junk food in hard times

February 2, 2009

SpamWhat food do people buy in bad economic times? The recent spate of headlines tells us:
  • "McDonald's to Expand, Posting Strong Results," Wall Street Journal, 1/27/09
  • "Campbell Soup sees boon in tight budgets," Bloomberg News, 11/23/08
  • "Spam sales up as economy heads down," UPI, 11/16/08
  • "Soup, cereal, and ramen manufacturers are high-fiving each other for every dip in the stock market. Packaged food sells well during these troubled economic times," New York Magazine, September 2008
According to press reports, pancake mix, macaroni and cheese, Jell-O, Kool-Aid, Hersey's candies, Velveta Cheese, McDonald's, Campbell Soup, and Hormel's iconic Spam are experiencing growing sales, despite the economic downturn.

Workers on the Spam line in Austin — more than 40 of them work two shifts —see no signs that their work schedule will let up. "We are scheduled to work every day except Thanksgiving and Christmas," said Darwin Sellers, 56, a Spam "formulator" who adds salt, sugar and nitrites to batches of Spam. "[Our boss] is negotiating with the man upstairs to get us to work eight days a week."

Dr. Grout's Comment:
Meanwhile, the new inhabitants of the White House have brought their own chef with them, Sam Kass, a culinary artist who wants to make a statement to the nation about healthy food.

Kass is said to have a particular interest in healthy food and local food. He is one of the new breed of chefs concerned about the environment and about Americans' poor eating habits. He has been quoted as saying people in his profession should take the lead in tackling public health issues. "Not only is there an unconscionable amount of people who remain hungry," he told "In These Times" magazine last year, "there's even a larger population, mostly poor, who are faced with obesity, diabetes and various other problems from overabundance."

I would clarify that to be an overabundance of processed food, not an overabundance of presticide-free vegetables, farm-fresh eggs naturally high in omega-3, and naturally raised meats. Kass has spoken about the high levels of fried fat and sugar in school lunches and the need for change.

For those who don't have a personal chef to teach about healthy food, and don’t want to bulk up on the kinds of foods that feed chronic inflammation, there is FirstLine Therapy at the Arizona Center for Advanced Medicine. Give us 12 weeks and we will literally hold your hand while you learn how to eat economically, and create a dietary lifestyle that reduces the risks of diabetes, heart disease, and other disorders that have their roots in chronic inflammation. You will learn how an anti-inflammatory diet is both good food, and good medicine. It is an investment whose time has come.

The battle over irradiation of foods heats up

February 2, 2009

Before the recent revelation that peanut butter could kill people, and before the spinach scare of three summers ago, the nation's food industry made a proposal. It asked the government for permission to destroy germs in many processed foods by zapping them with radiation. The federal government decreed that it is safe. The Grocery Manufacturers of America is now asking the FDA to permit irradiation of hot dogs and deli meats. But consumers have been slow to embrace the technology.

"It's unnecessary for people to be getting sick today with pathogens in spinach or pathogens in peanut butter," said Suresh Pillai, director of the National Center for Electron Beam Research at Texas A&M University. "We have the technologies to prevent this kind of illness."

Food and Water Watch, an advocacy group, has long maintained that irradiation would be too expensive, impractical and sometimes ineffective because it might hide filthy conditions at food processing plants. Patty Lovera, the group's assistant director, said irradiation not only kills bacteria but can also destroy nutrients in food.

Dr. Grout's Comment:
Living food has enzymes, vitamins and other components that give us life. Irradiation destroys the "aliveness" of food. Irradiation may sound protective, but the E. coli problem will still fester in commercial feedlots where animals are fed an unnatural diet that turns their meat acid. An acid environment - in cattle and in people - breeds disease. Irradiation does nothing about the commercial feedlot reduction of the good CLA (conjugated linoleic acid) and omega-3 content found in more naturally raised grass-fed beef. Zapping E. coli does not address the fundamental issues of healthy food. And as Michael Pollen, author of the Omnivore's Dilemma pointed out, super strains of E. coli are breeding in commercial feedlots.

The FDA's position is that irradiation has no effect on the nutritional value of the food; the destruction of phytonutrients is not of concern. However, the California producers of leafy greens saw it differently, thank goodness. In the aftermath of the contaminated spinach, they formed a voluntary group and developed a food safety protocol for its members. The approved business practices range from accommodating fieldworker sanitation to preventing animal contamination of leafy green vegetables. Good food = good health.

The high cost of health care is joined at the hip with problems in the diet. Most of today's chronic diseases stem from the Standard American Diet which has too few nutrients and too many unnatural elements like high fructose corn syrup, synthetic sweeteners, and trans fats. Irradiation is a band aid on a problem that needs a completely different fix.

Students who eat well perform much better in school

February 1, 2009

Britain's celebrity chef Jamie Oliver is teaching British school administrators how food impacts test scores and scholastic achievement.

Many schools resisted Oliver's "Feed Me Better" campaign due to the greater cost of the food. But an independent study shows the performance of 11-year-old pupils eating Oliver's meals improved by up to 8% in science and as much as 6% in English, while absenteeism due to ill-health fell by 15%.

The findings, from a report by the Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER) at Essex University, vindicate the chef's decision to use nutrient-rich foods such as coconut fish, and broccoli.

The ISER report focuses on schools in Greenwich, southeast London, where Oliver launched his healthy eating campaign with Channel 4 in 2004. This weekend Oliver said: "Even while doing the programme we could see the benefits to children's health: it made them calmer and therefore able to learn. The results are fantastic - it's the first time a proper study has been done into the positive effects of the "Feed Me Better" campaign. It strongly suggests we were right all along."

During the campaign, Oliver introduced red meat, pulses and green vegetables, while reducing sugar and saturated fat by eliminating processed foods such as Turkey Twizzlers.

Oliver's new menus, adopted by 81 out of 88 primary and secondary schools in Greenwich, included more pasta and fresh fruit, plus dishes such as Mexican bean wraps, chickpea soup and vegetable chow mein. Hayley Franklin, 11, from John Roan school in Blackheath, southeast London, said: "The new dinners give me much more energy, for longer, so I can concentrate on work through the whole day."

Trisha Jaffe, head teacher of Kidbrooke secondary school - the first school to test Oliver's menu, said: "Because the children aren't being stuffed with additives, they're much less hyper in the afternoons now."

Dr. Grout's Comment:
Way to go Jamie Oliver! Over on this side of the pond, we have some of the same results to report. The most documented case is probably that of Central Alternative High School in Appleton, Wisconsin. They had all kinds of discipline problems, low grades, kids bringing guns to school, etc. In 1997 they embarked on an experiment in their cafeteria. It was out with the French fries and sugar and soda, in with the fresh fruits, vegetables, flax seed and fresh smoothies. After the first year, the school reported dramatic decreases in the number of drop-outs, expulsions, use of drugs, and incidents of suicide. Grades went up. School officials say, "School districts across the nation are looking for ways to improve their schools, but they often overlook an important influence on learning - good nutrition. The connection between nutrition, chronic disease, and learning is well established among scientists, and they are clearly aware that inadequate food intake limits children's ability to learn about their world. Researchers know that chronically undernourished children must use their energy for tasks in order of most importance: first for maintenance of critical organ functions, second for growth, and last for social interaction and overall cognitive functioning."

Eating healthier food improves the ability of the mind to concentrate. Food is information. Doing away with the typical "kid food" and adding omega-3s and vegetables is good for the brain.

Brain exercises develop fitness above the neck

February 1, 2009

From video games that claim to sharpen concentration to brain gyms offering mental circuit training, consumers are jumping on the "use it or lose it" concept of brain health.

Brain fitness is predicated on the relatively new scientific concept of "brain plasticity" — that the brain can be changed and improved rather than steadily declining from a fixed state, as previously believed.

People start noticing memory slips and looking for solutions around age 40, says Michael Cole, CEO of Vancouver-based Fit Brains, which launched a series of online games in September targeting five major "brain muscles" or cognitive functions such as memory and logic. "I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but after 25 it starts to decline," he says.

"The baby boomers, as we all know, are only a year or two from turning 65," says Colin Milner, CEO of the Vancouver-based International Council on Active Aging. "When people are spending money on everything from Botox and butt implants to bleaching of your skin, there's a lot of stuff taking place around vanity. And there's nothing more vain than being able to remember who the heck you're speaking to."

Nintendo's Brain Age game propelled the notion of brain fitness into the mainstream, he says. "The key with all of this — whether it's physical activity or brain fitness — is stimulating the user to use it," he says.

Dr. Grout's Comment:
Vanity is being able to remember people's names and what you were talking about 5 minutes ago? I don't think so. Memory is fundamental to life. How much we can accomplish in our work and our everyday life often depends on our memory. Memory is an essential part of our attention span. We all know how annoying it can be, to talk with someone who can't "keep their mind" on one subject for longer than 30 seconds. It becomes almost impossible to make decisions and carry out plans – whether those decisions have to do with going to the grocery store or which scientific experiment we are in the middle of.

Brain function is hugely important for all of us – and particularly for the Baby Boomers who are approaching the age when unfortunate lifestyle choices begin to show their results – choices leading to heart disease, diabetes, poor circulation of blood to the brain, and early problems with memory. BrainAdvantage™ is a patented program we use to help patients with issues ranging from age-related memory loss to ADHD and traumatic brain injury. We have seen some dramatic results with the use of BrainAdvantage's hemoencephalography biofeedback.

alternative medicine Scottsdale Arizona


Arizona Advanced Medicine
  © Copyright 2007 - 2012. All Rights Reserved. Arizona Center for Advanced Medicine.
Serving the Phoenix metro area including Scottsdale, Mesa, Glendale, Chandler, Tempe,
Paradise Valley, Peoria, Cave Creek, Carefree, Fountain Hills, Ahwatukee, Queen Creek
 
Arizona Center for Advanced Medicine